The knowledge were assessed within the several matched up-sample t-evaluation evaluate participants’ thinking of its number 1 and additional relationships

The knowledge were assessed within the several matched up-sample t-evaluation evaluate participants’ thinking of its number 1 and additional relationships

Comes from such analyses is demonstrated within the Table 1. All of our forecasts was supported. Especially, participants stated even more relationship acceptance because of the friends, deeper resource proportions, large quantities of connection, much more matchmaking pleasure, deeper interaction regarding the dating and greater top-notch correspondence for number one than the second relationships. On the other hand, participants reported deeper romantic privacy, high quality away from alternatives, and spending an increased ratio of energy on intercourse that have supplementary than the number 1 dating. Impact sizes of indicate differences befitting repeated strategies (i.e., Cohen’s d) were calculated with the value of the newest t-decide to try, the new correlation between them paired-setting, plus the complete test proportions. Impact brands was in fact average so you can highest, apart from quality of alternatives, which had been relatively small. Perception systems weren’t predicted good priori, nevertheless the large take to proportions, together with the mainly reasonable in order to high impression systems, suggests that the results is actually sturdy. Results for number one and you will supplementary dating was consistent with the overall attempt as well. Observe study, sentence structure, and productivity to your analyses involving most of the members (age.g., study folded such that participants who declaration co-primaries or no primaries are also included), delight select:

Exploratory analyses

Next, we compared acceptance of secondary partners from family vs. friends (using a paired-samples t-test). Consistent with predictions, participants’ perceptions of acceptance for secondary relationships were greater for friends (M = 6.27, SD = 2.26) than family (M = 4.30, SD = 2.45); t(865) = , p < .001; d = 0.83. Baca selengkapnya